It gets worse. On his YouTube channel, he has posted an explanation of his reasons for doing what he's doing. Among them:
- Flesh-eating robots. Sure, they haven't actually been developed yet, and the creators never actually said anything about using corpses for fuel (that was a fun little factoid added by the ultra-conservative media, to teach us that science is scary and that only crazy, evil bastards use it), but holy mother of god flesh-eating robots!!! RUN!!!
- The Army is rehearsing to take over the country right now. This is apparently a reference to the so-called "gun confiscation drill" conducted in Iowa in April and the international FEMA terror drills that are taking place. Also, the vlogger has heard stupid rumours of "burnout drills" (setting fire to citizens' homes to evacuate them from an area). After the epic fail that was Katrina disaster relief, you'd think people would be happy to see FEMA officials doing some dry runs. They could sure use the practice.
- Food shortages, riots, and martial law are imminent because THEY will cut off all water, electricity, and food supplies to major cities, to starve residents into submission. It will probably start in California. lol wut
- Swine Flu vaccinations may become mandatory. While I'm not comfortable with the idea of involuntary inoculation with a vaccine that has been developed quickly, I don't believe the vaccine is part of a "depopulation agenda". It would definitely be the first of its kind, because despite the occasional problems with contamination, no vaccine in recent history has harmed more people than it has helped.
- Obama's science czar, John Holdren, wants to impose limits on the number of children Americans can have. As the vlogger is actually holding a baby in his video, I don't fully understand why this is a concern for him. Does he really want seven more children that he'll have to hide from THEM?
- Each nation will be alotted so many babies. Only test tube babies will be allowed. The source of this info? Bertrand Russell. I love the guy, but dammit - he was one paranoid, misanthropic old mofo. Best not to take all his warnings literally.
- John Holdren plans to sterilize Americans against their will.
No, there isn't any evidence that antiandrogens found in some drinking water and pesticides were placed there to sterilize the male population. And Holdren's "plan" was more like a wild suggestion; I'm sure he wasn't dense enough to think it would be implemented in his lifetime.
The truth is, however, that Holdren and co-authors Paul and Anne Erlich did discuss involuntary population control in their 1977 book Ecoscience. Erlich had published an even more alarmist book, The Population Bomb, in 1968. Holdren and the Erliches wrote that if population growth wasn't slowed voluntary, involuntary sterilization could be introduced via food and water supplies. Women could be required to have abortions. Otherwise, mass starvation would result.
The strange thing is, Paul Erlich's failed predictions of the late '60s bear an eerie resemblance to the predictions Jones has been making: Food shortages could lead to the deaths of hundreds of millions. The only difference is, Erlich did not view such catastrophes as part of a depopulation scheme, but the inevitable result of overpopulation. He believed there would be worldwide famines in the '70s and '80s if population growth was not curbed.
Erlich knows he was wrong, or at least he knows that his timeline was whack. While he's still concerned about overpopulation, his views have been tempered considerably by age and experience. I think the same could safely be said of Holdren. The things both men wrote over 30 years ago probably seem as brash and silly to them now as they do to the rest of us.
It's not time to head for the hills just yet.
3 comments:
I still don't get why the NWO would want to depopulate the world to a few million. And other than 'cause they're evil' I'm not sure what believers think the ultimate goal is. Has Jones ever really clearly articulated the goal of the NWO of martial law, eugenics etc? The things he describes would be a means to an end, but has he ever come up with what end is?
The biomass eating robots are cute in a short circuit/walle kind of way. I've always been a sucker for robots.
OMG on the same page is a link to tiny robotic bats. I want one!
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,532184,00.html
That's a winning combo for me: Bats & robots. I am officially out of the uncanny valley now.
Jones thinks the elite want the earth to themselves. More resources, more elbow room, no more "useless eaters", and a smaller but genetically superior gene pool. It's a little bit like the Alternative 3 scenario, only they won't be leaving Earth. He bases his theory mostly on the Bill Gates Sr. and Warren Buffet links to Planned Parenthood, UN hopes to curb overpopulation, and some of the unethical medical experiments conducted during the Cold War.
The thing is, there have been depopulation efforts - but they're never directed at white people or the general population. They're aimed at specific racial and ethnic groups. In Canada, for instance, there was a longterm effort to thin out the aboriginal population as much as possible by incarcerating the children. Those that resisted indoctrination were exposed to disease, abuse, substandard medical care, and sometimes murder.
But has this kind of thing ever been done indiscriminately? I don't think so. World overpopulation has never been a genuine concern of the elite. They may pay lip service to the issue once in a while, but let's face it; depopulation would destroy their tax bases, drain the cheap-labour pool that gets their houses clean, destroy their most lucrative industries, etc.
If anything, the elite want more people on this planet. Conservs have always insisted that we need more people in the U.S. and Canada. They urge women to have as many children as they can stand, they oppose abortion and even birth control, and they support the multi-billion dollar fertility industry. Doesn't sound like depopulation to me.
Post a Comment